首页 关于我们 杂志征订 网上投稿 文章搜索 资料下载 广告联系 English 版权声明
*推荐文章 刊物期号: 201801

搅拌棒吸附法与固相微萃取提取葡萄酒香气成分比较(33)

作者: 张 莉,王瑞庆

地址:上饶师范学院生命科学学院,江西 上饶 邮编:334001
摘要 采用固相微萃取 (solid phase microextraction,SPME)和搅拌棒吸附萃取法(stir bar sorptive extraction,SBSE)提取葡萄酒中的香气成分,用气相色谱-质谱联用测定其化学成分,并对两种提取方法的提取效果进行了比较。固相微萃取法提取的葡萄酒香气成分是28种,而搅拌棒萃取法提取的葡萄酒香气成分是53种,两者相同的成分有15种。在相同实验条件下,采用SBSE法可以大量捕集到葡萄酒中的痕量及难挥发性成分,提取化合物种类更多,可以更加全面地鉴定葡萄酒的香气成分。
关键词 搅拌棒吸附萃取; 固相微萃取; 葡萄酒; 香气
中图分类号: TS262.6;TS261.4;TS261.7 文献标识码: A 文章编号: 1001-9286(2018)01-0033-05

英文标题: Comparison of the Extraction of Flavoring Compounds of Grape Wine by Solid Phase Microextraction and by Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction

英文作者: ZHANG Li and WANG Ruiqing

英文地址: College of Life Science, Shangrao Normal University, Shangrao, Jiangxi 334001, China

英文摘要 The flavoring compounds of grape wine were extracted by SPME and SBSE respectively. The extraction effects of the two methods were compared. In addition, the extracted flavoring compounds were determined by GC-MS. As a result, 28 kinds of flavoring compounds were determined through SPME and 53 kinds of flavoring compounds were determined through SBSE. Among all the flavoring compounds extracted by the two methods, 15 kinds were the same. Under the same experimental conditions, SBSE was more sensitive and better than SPME, because it could extract more flavoring compounds and trace compounds of grape wine.
英文关键词 stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE); solid phase microextraction (SPME); grape wine; aroma
      

http://weibo.com/gznjkj

微信号:gznjkj


酿酒科技版权声明:
①凡本站未注明来源的作品均为本站原创,版权属于酿酒科技杂志社,其他媒体转载须注明来源为“酿酒科技”。
②凡本站注明“来源:XXX”的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本站赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。我们力所能及地注明初始来源和原作者,如果您觉得侵犯了您的权益,请通知我们,我们会立即改正。
版权事宜或内容合作请联系:njkj2014@163.com


版权所有 酿酒科技杂志社 2001-2016
电子邮件:NJKJ@263.net,lmst@public.gz.cn,njkj@chinajournal.net.cn